Ver el código de «Portal:Bibliografía»

*	Allen, L.E., Allen, R.W., and Miller, J.C. (1966). Programmed games and the learning of problem solving skills: The WIFF’N PROOF example. The Journal of Educational Research,55, 22-25.
*	Au, J.W. (2001). A Spector haunts gaming: Inside the mind of Deus Ex designer Warren Spector. GameSlice. Last retrieved 3 November 2003 from http://www.gameslice.com/features/spector/index.shtml
*	Baker, E.H. (1969). A comparative study of textbook and simulation approaches in teaching consumer credit to senior high school students in comparison to a conventional approach to instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
*	Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 
*	Barab, S., A., Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch, L., Squire, K., & Keating, T. (2002). Using activity theory to understand the contradictions characterizing a technology-rich introductory astronomy course. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(2).
*	Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M., & Squire, K. (2001). Constructing virtual worlds: Tracing the historical development of learner practices/understandings. Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 47-94.
*	Barab, S. A., & Kirshner, D. (2001). Methodologies for capturing learner practices occurring as part of dynamic learning environments. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 10(1&2), 5-15.
*	Barab, S. A., Cherkes-Julkowski, M., Swenson, R., Garrett. S., Shaw, R. E., & Young, M. (1999). Principles of self-organization: Ecologizing the learner-facilitator system. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3&4), 349-390.
*	Barab, S.A. & Squire, K.D. (in press). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. To appear in The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 
*	Barab, S. A., Squire, K., & Barnett, M. (1999, April). From teachers’ fixed curricular objectives toward students’ emergent practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, CA.
*	Barkin, G. (2002). Culture in Civilization III. Joystick101.org
*	Barnett, M. Barab, S.A., Schatz, S., Warren, S. (2000). Designing a Community of Inquiry in an Undergraduate History Course: A Clash of Cultures. Paper presented at the 2000 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. 
*	Bartle, R. (1996). Hearts, Clubs, Diamonds, Spades: Players who suit MUDs. Journal of MUD Research, 1(1). Available: http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm (19 May 1996).
*	Bartle, R. (2003). Designing virtual worlds. Indianapolis: New Riders.
*	Barnett, M., Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2001). The virtual solar system project: Student modeling of the solar system. The Journal of College Science Teaching, 30(5), 300-305.
*	Beck, I., McKeown, M. & Gromoll, E. (1989). Learning from social studies texts. Cognition and Instruction (6), 99-158.
*	Becker, H.A. (1980).  The emergence of simulation and gaming. Simulation and Games, 11, 223-345.
*	Bednar, A. K.; Cunningham, D.; Duffy, T.; Perry, J. . (1995). Theory into practice: how do we link? In G. Anglin. Instructional Technology: Past, Present and Future. (2nd Ed.) Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.
*	Berson, M.J. (1996). Effectiveness of Computer Technology in the Social Studies: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28 (4), 486-99.
*	Blanton, W. E., Moorman, G. B., Hayes, B. A., & Warner, M. W. (1997). Effects of participation in the Fifth Dimension on far transfer. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16, 371-396.
*	Boocock, S.S. (1968). An experimental study of the learning effects of two games with simulated environmments. In S.S. Boocock & E.O. Schild (Eds.), Simulation games in learning. (pp. 107-133). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
*	Bradshaw, L. (2002). Case Study: Sim City. Presentation made to the Markle Foundation January 31, 2002. http://www.markle.org/News/SimCity01-31-02.pps
*	Brooker, R.G. (1988). Truth as a variable: Teaching political strategy with simulation games. Simulation & Games, 19, 43-58.
*	Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
*	Brown, A.L., Campione, J.C., Webber, J.S., & McGilly, K. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In Gifford, B.R. & O’Connor, M.C. (Eds.) Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
*	Brown K. & Cole, M. (2002). Cultural historical activity theory and the expansion of opportunities for learning after school. http://lchc.ucsd.edu/People/MCole/browncole.html
*	Carroll, J. M. (1998). Minimalism Beyond the Nurnberg Funnel. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
*	Cassell, J. & Jenkins, H. (1998). From Barbie to Mortal Kombat : Gender and computer games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
*	Chi, M., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 7-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
*	Church, D. (2000). Abdicating authorship. Presentation made at the annual meeting of the Game Developer’s Conference, San Jose, CA. March.
*	Clark, R. E. 1983. Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research 53(4), 445-459.
*	Clarke, W. (1970). A research note on simulation in the social studies. Simulation and Games, 1, 203-210
*	Clegg, A.A. (1991). Games and simulations in social studies education. In Shaver, J. P., (Ed). Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan. Pp. 523-528.
*	Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. Journal for the Learning Sciences, 10(1&2), 113-164. 
*	Cobb, P., Confrey, P. diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
*	Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, (1993). Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisted. Educational Technology, 33 (3), 52- 70. 
*	Cohen, K.C. (1970). Effects of the CONSUMER GAME on learning and attitudes of selected seventh grade students in a target –area school, Report No. 65. The center for the Study of Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
*	Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A Once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Press.
*	Cole, M. & Wertsch, J. V. Beyond the individual-social antimony in discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky. Unpublished manuscript last retrieved 3 November 2003 from: http://www.massey.ac.nz/~alock/virtual/colevyg.htm
*	Colella, V., Klopfer, E., and Resnick, M. (2001). Adventures in Modeling: Exploring Complex, Dynamic Systems with StarLogo. New York: Teachers College Press.
*	Collins, (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). New York: Springer-Verlag.
*	Collins A., Brown, J. S., and Newman, S. E.. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. Resnick, (Ed.) Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1989.
*	Collins, P., Shukla, S., Redmiles, D. (2002). Activity Theory and System Design: A View from the Trenches. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: the Journal of Collaborative Computing 11 (1-2): 55-80.
*	Cordtz, W.W. (1969). A simulation methodology of instruction in  a college course of American Studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, United States International Universty.
*	Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715-730. 
*	Counsell, C. (2000). Historical knowledge and historical skills: A dichotomy. In J. Arthur, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Issues in History Teaching (pp. 54-71). London: Routledge.
*	Cowley, R. (1999). What if? New York: Berkley Books. 
*	Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990. Flow: The psychology of optical experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
*	Cunningham, D. J. (1992). Beyond Educational Psychology: Steps Toward a Educational Semiotic. Educational Psychology Review 4, 165-194.
*	De Carteau, M. (1984). General Introduction. The Practice of Everyday Life.Trans. Steven F. Rendail. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984. 
*	Denzin, N.K., (1989). The research act, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
*	Dewey, J. (1938). Logic, the theory of inquiry. New York: H. Holt and Co.
*	Diamond, J. (1999). Guns, germs, and steel: The fates of human societies. New York: Norton. 
*	Dick, W. (1991). An instructional designer's view of constructivism. Educational Technology, 31(5), 41-44. 
*	Dooley, B.J. (1969). Research on the market game. In G. Dawson (Ed.) Economic Education experiences of enterprising teachers, Vol. 5. New York: Joint Council on Economic Education.
*	Downey M. T. & Levstick, L. S. (1991). Teaching and learning history. In Shaver, J. P., (Ed). Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan pp. 400-410.
*	Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, (pp. 170-198). Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
*	Duffy, T.M. & Jonassen, D.H. (1991). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology? Educational Technology, 31(5), 7-11. 
*	Duke, R.D. (1964). Game-simulation studies in urban land use allocation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
*	Dunn, R. (2000). 
*	Edmonds, B. & Hales, D. (n.d.). Computational simulation as theoretical experiment. Report published by the Centre for Policy Modelling, Aytoun Building, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK. Retrieved  on 3 November 2003 from http://cfpm.org/cpmrep106.html
*	Ehman, L. (1980). The American school in the political socialization process. Review of Educational Research, 50(1). 99-119.
*	Ehman, L. & Glenn, A.D. (1987). Computer-based education in the social studies. Bloomington, IN: Social studies Development Center ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/ Social Science Education.
*	Ehman, L. H. & Glenn, A. D. (1991). Interactive technologoy in social studies. In Shaver, J. P., (Ed). Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.Pp 513-522.  
*	El'konin, D.B. (1971). Toward The Problem of Stages in the Mental Development of Children. Voprosy psikhologii, 1971. No. 4, 6-20; Soviet Translated: Nikolai Veresov. Online Version: Psychology and Marxism Internet Archive (marxists.org) 2000
*	Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-konsultit.
*	Engestrom, Y., (1990). When is a tool? Multiple meanings of artifacts in human activity. In: Y. Engestrom, (Ed). Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy. 171-195.
*	Engeström, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.) Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 64-103). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
*	Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki, (Eds.). Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
*	Feurzeig, W., and N. Roberts. (1999) Modeling and Simulation in Precollege Science and Mathematics. NY: Springer.
*	Fletcher, J.L. (1971). The effectiveness of simulation games as learning environments: A progrposed program of research. Simulation and Games, 2, 473-488.
*	Friedman, T. (1999). Civilization and Its Discontents: Simulation, Subjectivity, and Space. In Smith, G. (Ed.). On a Silver Platter: CD-ROMs and the Promises of a New Technology. NY: New York University Press, 1999.
*	Frye, B. & Frager, A.M. (1996). Civilization, Colonization, SimCity: Simulations for the Social Studies Classroom. Learning and Leading with Technology, 24(2), 21-23, 32.
*	Games-to-Teach Team. (2003). Design principles of next-generation digital gaming for education. Educational Technology, 43(5), 17-33.
*	Gardner, H. (1991). The Unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.
*	Garvey, D. M. & Seiler, W.H. (1966). A study of effectiveness of different methods of teaching international relations to high school students (Final report cooperative research project No. S-270). Emporia: Kansas State Teachers College.
*	Gee, J.P. (1992). The social mind: Language, ideology, and social practice. New York: Bergin & Garvey. 
*	Gee, J. P. (2000-2001).  Identity as an analytic lens for research in education.  Review of Research in Education 25: 99-125.
*	Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning. New York: Palgrave.
*	Geertz, C. (1983). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In R. M. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research: A collection of readings (pp. 37–59). Prospect Heights, IL:Waveland Press.
*	Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
*	Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
*	Gredler, M.E. (1996). Educational games and simulations: A technology in search of a research paradigm. In In Jonassen, D.H. (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, p. 521-539. New York: MacMillan.
*	Greene, S. (1994). The problems of learning to think like a historian: Writing history in the culture of the classroom. Educational Psychologist, 29(2), 89-96.
*	Grossman, 2000. Testimony before the United States Senate Commerce Committee, March 21, 2000. 
*	Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1983). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. In G. F. Madaus, M. S. Scriven., and D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 311-334). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
*	Guberman, S. R., & Saxe, G. B. (2000). "Mathematical problems and goals in children’s play of an educational game." Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 201-216.
*	Guy, E. S. 2003 Patterns as Artifacts for User-Developer Collaborative Design. ECSCW 2003 Workshop W1: Applying Activity Theory to CSCW Research and Practice. 8th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Design, Helsinki, Finland, September 14-91, 2003. http://www.uku.fi/atkk/actad/ecscw2003-at/guy.pdf
*	Hakkarainen, P. 1999. Play and Motivation in Engström, Y. Miettinen, R. & Punamäki, R-L (eds.). Aspects on Activity Theory. Cambridge University Press.
*	Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J.D., & Smaldino, S.E. (1996). Instructional media and technologies for learning (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
*	Herz, J.C. (1997). Joystick Nation. How videogames ate our quarters, won our hearts, and rewired our minds. Princeton, NJ: Little Brown & Company. 
*	Hetzner, D.R. (1972). Life decisions: A computer-based simulation game for social studies classrooms (Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo). Dissertation Abstracts International, 33, 1078A.
*	Holland, W., Jenkins, H., & Squire, K. (2003). Theory by design. In Wolf, M.J. P. & Perron, B. (Eds.) The video game theory reader. New York: Routledge. *
*	Hope, W. C. (1996). It's Time to Transform Social Studies Teaching. Social Studies, 87(4).149-151.
*	Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 
*	Jenkins, H. (in press). Games, the new lively art. In Goldstein, J. & Raessens, J. (Eds.) Handbook of Computer Game Studies (Cambridge: MIT Press, Forthcoming). 
*	Jenkins, H. Squire, K. & Tan, P. (in press). You can’t bring that game to school! Design of Supecharged. To appear in Laurel, B. (Ed.) Design research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 
*	Johnson, S. (2002). Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities and software. New York: Touchstone Books.
*	Johnson, R.T., Johnson, D.W., & Stanne, M.B. (1985). The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. On computer-assisted instruction. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.
*	Kim, A. J., Koster, R. & Vogel, R. (2001). Community Design for Large-Scale Gaming Worlds. Workshop presented at the Game Developer’s Conference, San Jose, CA:, March.
*	King & Borland, Dungeons and Dreamers: The Rise of Computer Game Culture from Geek to Chic. 
*	Klopfer, E. & Squire, K. (2003). Collaboration in Augmented Worlds. Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, June, Norway.
*	Kolson, K. (1994). The Politics of City Planning Simulations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, NY, September 1-4, 1994.
*	Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 
*	Laurel, B. (2002). Utopian entrepreneur. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 
*	Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
*	Lee, J.L. (1994). Effectiveness of the Use of Simulations in a Social Studies Classroom. ERIC Documents.
*	Leont’ev, A. (1981). Problems of the development of mind. Moscow: Progress.
*	Leont’ev, A. (1989). The problem of activity in the history of Soviet psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27(1), 22–39.
o	Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the "overjustification" hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129-137.
*	Levstik, L. S., & Barton, K. C. (1997). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 
*	Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
*	Livingston, S.A. (1970a). Simulation games as advanced organizers in the learning of social science materials (Report No. 64). The Center for the Study of Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
*	Livingston, S.A. (1970b). Simulation games and attitude changes: Attitudes toward the poor (Report No. 63). The Center for the Study of Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
*	Livingston S. A. &  Stoll, C.S. (1973). Simulation games: an introduction for the social studies teacher. New York: Free Press.
*	Lloyd, J.W. (1970). Role playing, collective bargaining and the measurement of attitude change. The Journal of Economic Education (1), 104-110.
*	Loewen, J. W. (1995). Lies my teacher told me: Everything your American history textbook got wrong. New York: Simon & Schuster.
*	Mabry, L. (1999). Portfolio plus: A critical guide to alternative assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
*	Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, (4), 333-369.
*	Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomic model of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction: III. Conative and affective process analysis (pp. 223-253). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
*	Mayer, R. E., Quilici, J. H., Moreno, R., Duran, R., Woodbridge, S., & Simon, R. (1997). Cognitive consequences of participation in a Fifth Dimension after-school computer club.  Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16, 353-370.
*	McLaren, P. (1994). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Longman Publishing.
*	Media-X. website? Press release/
*	Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In Linn, R. L., (Ed.) Educational measurement (3rd Ed. pp. 13-103). New York: American Council on Education, MacMillan.
*	Mitchell, E. (1985). The dynamics of family interaction around home video games. Special Issue: Personal computers and the family. Marriage and Family Review 8(1-2), 121)-135. 
*	Monroe, M. W. (1968). Games as teaching tools: An examination of the COMMUNITY LAND USE GAME. Unpublished master’s thesis, Cornell University. 
*	Murray, J. H. (1997). Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyperspace. New York: The Free Press. 
*	Nicolopoulou, A., & Cole, M. (1993), Generation and transmission of shared knowledge in the culture of collaborative learning: The Fifth Dimension, its play-world, and its institutional contexts. In E. Forman, N. Minick, & C. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning (pp. 283-314). New York: Oxford.
*	Patterson, J. H. & Smith, M.S. (1986). The role of computers in higher order thinking. In J.A. Culbertson & L.L. Cunningham (Eds.), Microcomputers in education. 85th Yearbook fo the National Society for the Study of Education (Part I, ,pp. 81-108). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
*	Pellegrini, A. D. (Ed.). (1995). The future of play theory: A multidisciplinary inquiry into the contributions of Brian Sutton-Smith. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
*	Peirce, C.S. (1877/1986). The Fixation of Belief. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.) The Essential Peirce (Vol 1, pp. 186-1999). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
*	Peirce, C.S. (1878/1986). Deduction, induction, and hypothesis. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.) The Essential Peirce (Vol 1, pp. 109-122). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
*	Peirce, C.S. (1897/1985). Logic as Semoitic: The theory of signs. In Innis, R.E (Ed.), Semiotics, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
*	Perkins, D.N. (1992). Smart schools: Better thinking and learning for every child. New York: Free Press.
*	Poole, Steven (2000) Trigger Happy: Videogames and the entertainment revolution. London: 4th Estate. 
*	Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Game-Based Learning. New York: McGraw Hill.
*	Provenzo, E.F. (1991). Video kids: Making sense of Nintendo. Cambridge, MA: Harvard. 
*	Reiber, L. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Education and Training Resource & Development, 44, 42-58.
*	Reigeluth, C.M. (1999). Instructional-design theories and models, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
*	Resnick, L.B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13-20.
*	Resnick, M. (1994). Turtles, Termites, and Traffic Jams: Explorations in Massively Parallel Microworlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 
*	Roughgarden, J., Bergman, A., Shafir, S., & Taylor, C. (1996). Adaptive Computation in Ecology and Evolution: A Guide for Future Research. In R. Belew & M. Mitchell (Eds.), Adaptive Individuals in Evolving Populations: Models and Algorithms (Vol. Proceedings Volume XXVI Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Science of Complexity, pp. 25-30). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 
*	Salomon, G. (Ed.). (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
*	Salen, K. & Zimmerman, E. (2003). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
*	Savery, J. R., and Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35, 31-38. 
*	Schank, R. (1994). The Design of Goal-Based Scenarios. Journal of The Learning Sciences, 3(4), 303-304.
*	Scollen ,R & S (1981). Narrative, Literacy and Face in Interethnic Communication, Ablex.
*	Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999).  Towards the development of flexibly adaptive instructional design.  In C.  M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory (Vol.  2, pp.  183-213). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
*	Siexas, P. (2000). Schweigen! die Kinder! Or, Does postmodern history have a place in the schools? In Stearns, P.N. Seixas, P., & Wineburg, S. (Eds.), Knowing teaching & learning history: National and international Perspectives. New York: New York University Press.
*	Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text, and interaction. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
*	Spring, J. (1991). American education: An introduction to social and political aspects, 5th Ed. White Plains, NY: Longman Publishing.
*	Squire, K. (2002). Cultural Framing of Computer/Video Games, Game Studies: The International Journal of computer Game Research 1(2). http://www.gamestudies.org/0102/squire/
*	Squire, K. (2003). Video games in education. International Journal of Intelligent Games & Simulation, 2(1). Last retrieved November 1, 2003: http://www.scit.wlv.ac.uk/~cm1822/ijkurt.pdf
*	Squire, K.D., Makinster, J., Barnett, M., Barab, A.L., & Barab, S.A. (2003). Designed Curriculum and Local Culture: Acknowledging the Primacy of Classroom Culture. Science Education. 87:1– 22
*	Squire, K. & Jenkins, H. (2002). The art of contested spaces. In Game on!, King, L. (Ed.) London, England: Barbican.
*	Stadskley, R. (1969). A comparative study of simulation gaming and lecture-discussion method. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Minnesota.
*	Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
*	Stake, R.E. (2004). Standards-based and responsive evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
*	Starr, P. (1994). Seductions of sim, The American Prospect 5(17).
*	Stearns, P.N. Seixas, P., & Wineburg, S. (2000). Knowing teaching & learning history: National and international perspectives. New York: New York University Press.
*	Stipek, D.J. (1993).  Motivation to Learn: From Theory to Practice, 3ed.  (Chapter 4-Social Cognitive Theory, pp.43-58).  Boston:  Allyn&Bacon
*	Sutton-Smith, B. (1979). Play and learning. New York: Gardner Press.
*	Teauge, M. & Teague, G. (1995). Learning and Leading with Technology, 23 (1) 20-22.
*	Thiagarajan, S. (1998). The Myths and Realities of Simulations in Performance Technology. Educational Technology, 35-41.
*	Page: 9
Turkle, S. (1995).  Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Touchstone.
*	Turkle, S. (1997). "Seeing Through Computers," The American Prospect (8) 31
*	Turkle, S. (2003). 
*	Turner, Victor. "Liminality and communitas." The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine, 1969, pp. 94-113.
*	Vansledright, B. A. (1997/98). On the importance of historical positionality to thinking about and teaching history. The International Journal of Social Education, 12(2), 1-18.
*	Vincent, B. (1986). Design for decision-making in the classroom. T.H.E. Journal, 14, 80-84.
*	Vygotsky, L (1978). Mind and Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
*	Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The development of higher forms of attention in childhood. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, N.Y.: Sharpe.
*	Vygotsky, L.S. (1982) Sobranie sochinenii, Tom pervyi: Voprosy teorii i istorii psikhologii [Collected works, vol.I: Problems in the theory and history of psychology]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Pedagogika.
*	Wartofsky, M. (1973). Models. Dordrecht: D. Riedel.
*	Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
*	Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
*	Wentworth, D.R. (1972). The effectiveness of a learning game for teaching introductory economics in selected two-year colleges. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minessorta.
*	Wentworth, D.R. & Lewis, D.R. (1973). A review of research on instructional games and simulations in social studies education. Social Education. P. 432-440. 
*	Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
*	Wertsch, J. (2000). Can we teach knowledge and belief at the same time?. . In Stearns, P.N. Seixas, P., & Wineburg, S. (Eds.), Knowing teaching & learning history: National and international Perspectives., pp. 38-50. New York: New York University Press.
*	White, B.Y. & Frederickson, J.R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.
*	Whitson, J.A. (1997). Cognition as semiosic process: From situated mediaton to critical reflective transcendence. In Kirshner, D. & Whitson, J. A. (Eds.) Situated Cognition: Social, Semiotic, and Psychological Perspectives, pp. 97-150. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 
*	Wineburg, S. (1992). "Probing the Depths of Students' Historical Knowledge." Perspectives: Newsletter of the American Historical Association 30, 20-24.
*	Wineburg, S. (1999). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert / expert study in the interpretation of historical texts,” Cognitive Science (22) 319-346.
*	Wineburg, S. (2000). Making historical sense. In Stearns, P.N. Seixas, P., & Wineburg, S. (Eds.), Knowing teaching & learning history: National and international Perspectives., pp. 306-326. New York: New York University Press.
*	Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
*	Wing, R. L. (1966). Two computer-based economics games for sixth graders. The American Behavioral Scientist (10), 31-33.
*	Wolfram, S. (2002). A New Kind of Science. Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media, pp. 573 and 1072-1073, 2002. 
*	Wright, W. (2001). Design Plunder. Keynote at the 2001 Gaming Developer’s Conference, San Jose, CA.
*	Young, B. M., (2001). Doom as life in the rat race. Article posted at joystick101.org. Last retrieved November 3, 2003 from http://www.joystick101.org/story/2001/10/2/85544/4214